Thursday, March 01, 2007
Eminent Irony
My second “urban issues” piece is now available in Cities on a Hill.
In it, I explore the interplay of San Francisco’s discovery that it owns part of the land in Santa Clara slated for the 49ers new stadium and the current brouhaha over eminent domain.
Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
Friday, February 23, 2007
Copyright v. The Free Market
The Berkeley Center for Law and Technology (BCLT) invited me to give their lunchtime seminar yesterday. The audience was mostly students, and my host requested a copyright-oriented talk, having recently overloaded the crowd with patent speakers. I chose the title: Copyright v. The Free Market: A Clash of Titans. (Hey, the invitation came on Tuesday for a Thursday talk--cut me a little slack).
I promised to make my slides available. Feel free to use them subject to the following conditions:
1. You attribute Bruce Abramson as the author.
2. You direct listeners/viewers to www.theinformationist.com, where they can get their own set and see my other musings.
3. You let listeners/viewers know that I discuss these issues further in both Digital Phoenix and The Secret Circuit.
Note that my name and the website appear on every slide, and the book information appears on the last slide. Simply incorporating my last slide and leaving my footer information untouched will satisfy these minimal requirements.
For those who see some irony in my placing conditions on distribution of a talk that takes a sanguine view of copyright law, I can only say three things:
1. Removing my name and claiming independent authorship constitutes plagiarism--an issue entirely independent of copyright law.
2. None of my conditions interfere with market conditions.
And most of all. . .
3. A little bit of common courtesy never hurt anyone. People who like my presentations might also like my books.
Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
New Gig: Cities on a Hill
I seem to be moving into a whole new arena. Fred Siegel, perhaps best known for The Prince of the City: Giuliani, New York and the Genius of American Life
his 2005 book about Mayor Giuliani (or about New York City, depending upon whom you ask), is Editor-in-Chief of the blog Cities on a Hill. Cities on a Hill is a project of the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Civic Innovation. The blog discusses urban issues in cities across America, or as I like to put it, “free-market theory meets socialist practice.” Fred has graciously invited me to be an occasional left-coast correspondent--pushing me, for the first time, to keep an eye out for local issues.
My first piece--an impressionistic celebration of my first year as a San Franciscan--appeared today.
Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
Monday, February 19, 2007
Every Now and Then. . .
I just discovered that the editors of the Claremont Review of Books decided to publish my letter to Larry Arnn. (Maybe I should go ahead and renew my subscription after all).
That defies not only my original prediction, but also years of experience.
Added to my 2005 success at getting into the IHT, that makes two.
Those MSM walls are just a-tumblin’ down. . .
Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Radio Play in Boston
I’ve been delinquent in commenting on the ripple that Steve Jobs threw into the DRM debate last week. Nevertheless, some folks in Boston found me--with the diligent help of Kimberly Hataway (of Hathaway PR).
I’ll be talking about DRM with Craig Peterson. The show will play in the Boston Area, on WGIR, WGIN, and WGIP, on Saturday February 19, and on WLMW during the week of February 19.
Here’s a blurb:
What is Digital Rights Management? Why is Steve Jobs calling for its elimination? Why has the RIAA been unsuccessful in stopping the “sharing” of music? What is the future of the music and movie industries’ distribution and sales? Selected guests will appear on pre-recorded telephone interview segments on “Tech Talk With Craig Peterson.”
I’m one of the “selected guests.” Stay tuned. . . I’ll post a podcast link when I get one.
Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
Monday, January 29, 2007
The Informationist Decides, 2008 (or at least he starts thinking about 2008)
As long-time readers know, I severed my longstanding affiliation with the Democratic Party in January 2005, when President Bush used his inaugural address to properly orient American foreign policy toward the promotion of liberal democracy abroad. The Democratic response varied from tepid to negative. To make matters worse, just as Bush was trying (with limited success) to get the Republican Party in line with his vision, the Democrats appointed Howard Dean DNC Chair. Eighteen months earlier, I had told Dean supporters that, had the Democrats chosen him as their 2004 nominee, I would volunteer to help reelect Bush. The party’s subsequent choice of John Kerry struck me as a bottom-of-the-barrel but still palatable choice. My take on Kerry from December 2001 (when friends first broached the possibility of his becoming the next nominee) was that he was weak and unimpressive, but likely an improvement over Bush. I did a bit of (unenthusiastic) volunteer work for the Kerry campaign during the fall of 2004, but spent the entire period wondering whether I was backing the right candidate. More than two years later, I remain uncertain.
So where does that leave me in 2007, looking forward to 2008? It frees me to consider the entire field, without reference to party labels. Here’s my current categorical ranking—with plenty of ties (listed in alphabetical order) because a fair amount of pertinent information remains unknown:
1. Rudy Giuliani (R)
John McCain (R)
[large gap]
2. Hillary Clinton (D)
Newt Gingrich (R)
3. Joe Biden (D)
Bill Richardson (D)
[enormous gap]
4. Barack Obama (D)
Mitt Romney (R)
Tom Vilsack (D)
[large gap]
5. Sam Brownback (R)
6. Chris Dodd (D)
John Edwards (D)
Al Gore (D)
[large gap]
7. Mike Huckabee (R)
[unbridgeable gap]
8. Chuck Hagel (R)
If you’re wondering, foreign policy dominates my thinking. Here’s a bit of preliminary analysis:
Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
Friday, January 19, 2007
A Local Issue
Well, I finally found a local issue about which I feel strongly enough to voice my opinion: the pathetic lack of taxis in San Francisco.
One of the Taxi Commissioners sent me the following e-mail:
The Taxi Commission is currently conducting research for the annual Public Convenience and Necessity Hearing, which will occur February 13, 2007 at 6:30 PM in Room 400 of City Hall.
At this hearing, the Taxi Commission will consider whether or not to add more medallions (permits) for taxicabs to operate in the streets of San Francisco. Research has been ongoing and involves several components. We are very interested in hearing from members of the community. We’re hoping that you can submit responses to the following questions:
What has been your experience with the San Francisco taxicab industry? Do you have problems obtaining taxicabs on particular days and times, or in your neighborhood? What are the best aspects of the San Francisco taxicab industry? What are the worst?
We’d love to hear it all - the good, the bad, and the ugly. At a respondent’s request, we will keep identity confidential.
I could think of nothing good, but I remain undecided as to which aspects of SF taxis are bad and which are ugly.
I replied:
Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Something vs. Something
Anyone watching Israeli politics these days would have to notice a shocking incoherence--even by Israeli standards. Most of the folks that I know figured that we were witnessing weak politicians jockeying for power amidst a failed government. Over the past couple of days though, I’ve seen a couple of people suggest something else. In their view, all of the talk about “achieving peace” by forcing Israel to commit suicide has motivated Israeli politicians to throw their own individual peace plans into the ring. After all, you can’t beat something with nothing.
While I’m not going to jump on that bandwagon to let a failed government off the hook, I do think that Israel needs to say something--particularly to counter the resurgence of PR surrounding the non-serious “Saudi Plan.” Here’s my suggestion:
more...Comments (0) • Permalink • Tell-a-Friend